When a local farmer reached out to a neighbor about a mysterious wave of land purchases in their area, it seemed like just another small-town rumor. But as property records revealed the name Flannery LLC as the buyer of over 20,000 acres of farmland, the whispers grew louder, raising alarms among longtime ranchers and small landowners. This wasn’t just a case of wealthy outsiders snapping up a few parcels of picturesque countryside — it was the beginning of a high-stakes land grab with potentially profound implications for the future of rural America.
The Mask Behind the Curtain
For months, the identity of the buyers remained a closely guarded secret. Flannery LLC, it turned out, was a front for California Forever, a Silicon Valley-backed venture aiming to build a privately governed city in the heart of protected farmland. The group, funded by tech billionaires like Reid Hoffman, Laurene Powell Jobs, and Marc Andreessen, envisions a “green community” filled with affordable homes, shopping centers, and walkable neighborhoods. But to many local residents, these promises ring hollow.
The very nature of these secretive land grabs has a chilling effect on rural communities, eroding trust and fueling a sense of encroachment. For families that have worked the same fields for generations, the sudden influx of billionaire capital feels less like economic opportunity and more like a hostile takeover. As one farmer put it, “They came in the dark of night, and now they want us to roll over and sell our birthright. But we’re not going down without a fight.”
Secrecy and Suspicion
The veil of secrecy was only lifted in August 2023, when The New York Times broke the story, revealing the true scale and ambition of the project. Until then, the investors had operated in the shadows, quietly buying up land and, according to some, using aggressive tactics to pressure holdouts.
“We ourselves got a letter offering to buy our ranch at inflated prices,” one local farmer recalled. “We made it clear there’s no way we’re going to sell this ranch. Then they decided to sue the ones who would not sell to them.”
These lawsuits targeted dozens of family farmers who had refused to sell, accusing them of colluding to artificially inflate property values — an antitrust argument that struck many as both ironic and hypocritical, given the deep pockets of the buyers involved.
Economic Pressure and Legal Intimidation
For the farmers, the stakes are existential. Fighting these lawsuits has drained their resources, pushing some toward bankruptcy. The sheer cost of defending their land rights against billionaires has created a stark power imbalance. For the investors, these legal battles may be a small price to pay for control over tens of thousands of acres, but for the farmers, the stakes are nothing less than their livelihoods and family legacies.
This is not just a legal struggle but a psychological one, as rural communities watch their way of life being threatened by faceless corporations wielding seemingly limitless financial power. The irony is sharp: small family farms, often struggling to make ends meet, now find themselves up against some of the wealthiest individuals on the planet, forced into costly legal battles just to defend the land their ancestors cultivated.
The CEO Problem
The public face of California Forever is its CEO, Yan Schwameck, a former Goldman Sachs whiz kid with a reputation for blunt ambition. Schwameck’s approach has not endeared him to locals. Described as “crude” and out of touch with rural values, Schwameck has been criticized for failing to build trust with the very communities his project seeks to transform. In his 2009 self-published book, Racing Towards Excellence, Schwameck summed up his personal philosophy with a misquote often attributed to Ayn Rand: “The question isn’t who’s going to let me, it’s who’s going to stop me.”
This ethos has fueled the perception that the project’s backers are more interested in control than collaboration, more focused on profit than partnership. Schwameck’s detached, corporate approach has done little to bridge the cultural chasm between Silicon Valley’s fast-paced, disruptive ethos and the slower, more community-oriented values of rural life. This disconnect has only deepened the mistrust.
A Cautionary Tale for Rural America
The stakes of this project go far beyond one county’s farmland. If California Forever succeeds, it could set a national precedent, allowing billionaires to buy their way through local resistance and build privately governed enclaves on protected lands. Critics argue that this is not just a land deal, but a test of whether community rights can withstand the ambitions of Silicon Valley’s elite.
Broken Promises, Broken Trust
Many locals remain skeptical of the grand promises of affordable housing and community-oriented living. They point to the history of Silicon Valley itself — a region where tech giants once promised prosperity for all, only to leave thousands unhoused and struggling as wealth concentrated at the top.
“They promised them all these houses and all this,” one farmer said, reflecting on the parallels. “Well, look at them now — unhoused. They’re going to do the same thing to us.”
A Crossroads for the Future
As this battle over land and community autonomy unfolds, it raises critical questions about the future of rural America: Can local communities resist the gravitational pull of billionaire capital, or will the tech titans of today reshape the countryside as they once reshaped the digital world? For the farmers of this small county, the stakes could not be higher.
The Dark Enlightenment Connection
This struggle is more than a battle over land. It echoes a deeper philosophical and political shift tied to the Dark Enlightenment — a movement that rejects democratic norms in favor of elite technocratic rule. The California Forever project is not just a land grab. It is a potential test case for a new form of governance, where billionaires seek to create self-contained, privately governed enclaves, free from public oversight and local resistance.
Historical Context of the Dark Enlightenment
The Dark Enlightenment is a loosely connected set of ideas emerging from the early 2000s, often associated with tech entrepreneur Curtis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug) and philosopher Nick Land. At its core, it rejects Enlightenment values like democracy, equality, and universal rights, advocating instead for a return to hierarchy, technocracy, and elite control.
Yarvin’s concept of the “Cathedral” critiques the modern, progressive state as a decentralized, bureaucratic system that enforces conformity through media, academia, and cultural institutions. Land took this further, arguing that technology and capitalism should accelerate without restraint, leading to a post-human future governed by algorithmic logic rather than human sentiment.
Real-World Parallels
This is not the first time wealthy elites have attempted to carve out exclusive enclaves. Projects like Prospera in Honduras and Neom in Saudi Arabia reflect similar ambitions, where private investors seek to establish experimental societies with minimal democratic oversight. Like California Forever, these projects promise innovation, prosperity, and technological advancement, but critics warn they also risk becoming isolated citadels of wealth and privilege, disconnected from the broader social contract.
Share this post